<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with rfc9580]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with rfc9580]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/rfc9580</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:31:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/rfc9580.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[I&#x27;m getting quite annoyed with the state of #GnuPG as a packager.]]></title><description><![CDATA[@serebit well, not necessarily.We luckily have options for #OpenPGP outside of #GnuPG ]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/57f5bc38-7d14-4cf5-bd78-cb56e5707eed/i-m-getting-quite-annoyed-with-the-state-of-gnupg-as-a-packager.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/57f5bc38-7d14-4cf5-bd78-cb56e5707eed/i-m-getting-quite-annoyed-with-the-state-of-gnupg-as-a-packager.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dvzrv@chaos.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>