<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with ranching]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with ranching]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/ranching</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 21:35:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/ranching.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[This blows a hole in the all or nothing argument against solar fields on agricultural land.]]></title><description><![CDATA[@KFvMalssen @sleepy62 I’m just imagining a situation when drought is so severe that growing is impossible, or at least no longer profitable and/or subsidized.In western Canada at least, gov’t funded crop insurance gives farmers money when drought causes failure. We’re subsidizing (in Canada) not solving a problem. So many current practices work against doing both ag &amp; solar.  Will the issue become so extreme that rural agriculture is just abandoned for power generation?]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/21bf3e7f-7449-4727-9256-eb662de310f5/this-blows-a-hole-in-the-all-or-nothing-argument-against-solar-fields-on-agricultural-land.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/21bf3e7f-7449-4727-9256-eb662de310f5/this-blows-a-hole-in-the-all-or-nothing-argument-against-solar-fields-on-agricultural-land.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pinhman@humanwords.party]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>