<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with patents]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with patents]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/patents</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 18:08:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/patents.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Ok.. Having filed the provisional patent, I have genuinely tried to REDUCE the &#x27;signal&#x27; from my LLM vs. Human provenance discriminator.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Ok.. Having filed the provisional patent, I have genuinely tried to REDUCE the 'signal' from my LLM vs. Human provenance discriminator. I even tried rebuilding ALL of the data collection tool-chain and using only the tiniest of lightweight linear classifiers. No matter what I do the signal persists - this is from a set of data using a different scraper, from different sites, with a different set of LLM generators, with NO prompts (just responding to the sample text).. But the signal remains... #research #patents #ai #llm #human]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/026eb0d7-0a3b-43b4-91a5-95ef306dedbd/ok..-having-filed-the-provisional-patent-i-have-genuinely-tried-to-reduce-the-signal-from-my-llm-vs.-human-provenance-discriminator.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/026eb0d7-0a3b-43b4-91a5-95ef306dedbd/ok..-having-filed-the-provisional-patent-i-have-genuinely-tried-to-reduce-the-signal-from-my-llm-vs.-human-provenance-discriminator.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[nikolaihampton@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The US Patent Office have rejected a Nintendo Pokemon patent for summoning subcharacters https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gamingonlinux.com&#x2F;2026&#x2F;04&#x2F;the-us-patent-office-have-rejected-a-nintendo-pokemon-patent-for-summoning-subcharacters&#x2F;]]></title><description><![CDATA[@gamingonlinuxIf you hate video games be sure to send your money to Nintendo]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/e4db9bf3-bddf-4568-a2a1-c1754caef2c9/the-us-patent-office-have-rejected-a-nintendo-pokemon-patent-for-summoning-subcharacters-https-www.gamingonlinux.com-2026-04-the-us-patent-office-have-rejected-a-nintendo-pokemon-patent-for-summoning-subcharacters</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/e4db9bf3-bddf-4568-a2a1-c1754caef2c9/the-us-patent-office-have-rejected-a-nintendo-pokemon-patent-for-summoning-subcharacters-https-www.gamingonlinux.com-2026-04-the-us-patent-office-have-rejected-a-nintendo-pokemon-patent-for-summoning-subcharacters</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[saucerlost@mastodon.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>