<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with oralexams]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with oralexams]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/oralexams</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:16:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/oralexams.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[&quot;It’s a testing method as old as Socrates and making a comeback in the AI age.]]></title><description><![CDATA[@rationaldoge If I was still teaching I would 100% have implemented a policy of asking a portion of my students on each assignment to orally defend their work; the students would be selected based on those whose work triggers any sort of AI detection (both automated and my own gut suspensions) combined with a random number (to keep it equitable and minimise favouritism)The only reason I wouldn't be having every student orally defend every assignment is because of the time constraints of large class sizes.]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/ab495adf-427d-4d84-814b-a1a77f1355e7/it-s-a-testing-method-as-old-as-socrates-and-making-a-comeback-in-the-ai-age.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/ab495adf-427d-4d84-814b-a1a77f1355e7/it-s-a-testing-method-as-old-as-socrates-and-making-a-comeback-in-the-ai-age.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>