<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with nukes]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with nukes]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/nukes</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 06:44:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/nukes.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[LA Times: PG&amp;amp;E is overcharging Californians to keep Diablo Canyon open, report alleges]]></title><description><![CDATA[LA Times: PG&amp;E is overcharging Californians to keep Diablo Canyon open, report alleges"...A new report alleges Pacific Gas &amp; Electric inflated costs when it requested a loan for Diablo Canyon, potentially creating a $685.6-million cost to taxpayers if lawmakers don’t intervene.If ratepayer fees for Diablo Canyon were eliminated from 2027-30, experts say, California utility customers could save an estimated $1.84 billion in controversial subsidies...."(PAYWALL)https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2026-04-07/pge-overcharging-diablo-canyon-report#nukes #diablocanyon #powergrid #grid]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/eb53ffd1-da79-4d71-9f03-36a133562c77/la-times-pg-amp-e-is-overcharging-californians-to-keep-diablo-canyon-open-report-alleges</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/eb53ffd1-da79-4d71-9f03-36a133562c77/la-times-pg-amp-e-is-overcharging-californians-to-keep-diablo-canyon-open-report-alleges</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>