<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with nobots]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with nobots]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/nobots</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 23:10:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/nobots.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Discovering Ageless Linux]]></title><description><![CDATA[Discovering Ageless Linuxhttps://agelesslinux.org/We are not against child safety. We are against building surveillance infrastructure and calling it child safety.A law that required applications with genuine risk profiles — social media, messaging, dating apps — to display honest, human-readable safety information at the point of use would be a child safety law. A law that funded digital literacy education in schools would be a child safety law. A law that held platforms accountable for algorithmic amplification of harmful content to minors would be a child safety law.A law that requires every operating system to collect every user's age and transmit it to every application on demand is not a child safety law. It is an identity infrastructure mandate. The children are the justification. The infrastructure is the product.#Linux #systemd #AgeVerification #NoBot #NoBots #Debian]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/ab6779f9-940f-4ccd-943a-17bfaaa9fefb/discovering-ageless-linux</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/ab6779f9-940f-4ccd-943a-17bfaaa9fefb/discovering-ageless-linux</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jayess@tilde.zone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>