<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with fosscompliance]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with fosscompliance]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/fosscompliance</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 17:56:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/fosscompliance.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Quite the interesting fresh FOSS drama.]]></title><description><![CDATA[I'm unsure the #EuroOffice people might want to settle.Actually getting a judge to put down a precedent could be a good investment to keep developerso to add not-so-FOSS additions to open licenses.From my limited experience, it's uncommon for licenses getting litigated up to a verdict, which is arguably part of the issue with non-open licenses: their requests are often so disproportionate they might end up be torn out by a formal sentence.Of course, this would require them to be reasonably sure of winning it out, but somehow I don't think they would have started in first place if they thought otherwiseCC: @Karlitschek@mastodon.social]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/042b7a1b-7e6c-4dbb-8a7b-c47849aa24ac/quite-the-interesting-fresh-foss-drama.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/042b7a1b-7e6c-4dbb-8a7b-c47849aa24ac/quite-the-interesting-fresh-foss-drama.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sirtao@social.sirtao.it]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>