<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with flatline]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with flatline]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/flatline</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:11:13 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/flatline.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[As some of you may know, we&#x27;re building Flatline, a self‑hostable soft fork of the Signal Server.]]></title><description><![CDATA[@mollyim i also have some opinions about the new cryptosystem introduced by signal's new cryptographer and will be looking to implement a separate double ratchet implementation for separate reasons. i don't expect my implementation will be useful for the molly project but was wondering if there was any discussion about double ratchet vs spqr for this independent implementation]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/8941fd77-bf71-455d-96ae-7061b4a055e2/as-some-of-you-may-know-we-re-building-flatline-a-self-hostable-soft-fork-of-the-signal-server.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/8941fd77-bf71-455d-96ae-7061b4a055e2/as-some-of-you-may-know-we-re-building-flatline-a-self-hostable-soft-fork-of-the-signal-server.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hipsterelectron@circumstances.run]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>