<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with fep8b32]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with fep8b32]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/fep8b32</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 04:50:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/fep8b32.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[FEP-8b32 (Object Integrity Proofs) is getting updated: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;codeberg.org&#x2F;fediverse&#x2F;fep&#x2F;pulls&#x2F;839]]></title><description><![CDATA[FEP-8b32 (Object Integrity Proofs) is getting updated: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/839I added two new requirements:- Objects identified using fragment IDs SHOULD NOT have integrity proofs. It is enough to secure the top-level document.- Verifiers SHOULD ignore proofs that use unsupported algorithms and verification methods. This requirement provides forward compatibility, which is important because sooner or later we will need to use different algorithms.#fep_8b32 #fep #fedidev]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/303c8633-c838-4bb0-b568-afb989f13351/fep-8b32-object-integrity-proofs-is-getting-updated-https-codeberg.org-fediverse-fep-pulls-839</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/303c8633-c838-4bb0-b568-afb989f13351/fep-8b32-object-integrity-proofs-is-getting-updated-https-codeberg.org-fediverse-fep-pulls-839</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>