<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with deepseekv4]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with deepseekv4]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/deepseekv4</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 04:13:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/deepseekv4.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Yesterday’s side‑by‑side release of #GPT‑5.5 and #deepseekv4 is interesting, but not for the usual “is this a leap?” debate]]></title><description><![CDATA[Yesterday’s side‑by‑side release of #GPT‑5.5 and #deepseekv4  is interesting, but not for the usual “is this a leap?” debate.What stands out is that DeepSeek continues to operate near this tier at all, given the hardware and compute constraints they’re clearly optimizing against. That’s not luck; it’s a sustained signal about where leverage actually lives and the biggest battle in the industry. 🧵1/4]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/41982669-52af-476c-8143-af3663fb02f5/yesterday-s-side-by-side-release-of-gpt-5.5-and-deepseekv4-is-interesting-but-not-for-the-usual-is-this-a-leap-debate</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/41982669-52af-476c-8143-af3663fb02f5/yesterday-s-side-by-side-release-of-gpt-5.5-and-deepseekv4-is-interesting-but-not-for-the-usual-is-this-a-leap-debate</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mamba@mstdn.ca]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>