<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with creativearts]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with creativearts]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/creativearts</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 20:48:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/creativearts.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[They can&#x27;t suppress us.]]></title><description><![CDATA[They can't suppress us. They can't out passion us. So they're trying to gaslight consumers into believing that AI is a better option for creatives. But anyone who has interacted with a creative knows that is bs. Heck, AI can't even handle coding. So what I'm trying to say is that as much as big tech is trying to push passion out of the creative arts, the creative arts will never leave the passion.#CreativeEconomy #CreativeArts #NoAI #PassionNotNumbers]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/a65886be-bee6-487b-a3aa-f1bda6959074/they-can-t-suppress-us.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/a65886be-bee6-487b-a3aa-f1bda6959074/they-can-t-suppress-us.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[miswiredke@toot.community]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>